back to work

AI operations platform for small trucking carriers

A one-company internal pilot built from 15+ months of real operational data, with expansion to two–three additional carriers next.

Independent 0-to-1 product2026 — nowProduct discovery, MVP definition, technical feasibilityproduct · engineering · carrier operatorsfunctional MVP · internal pilot
90%+invoice/payment detection accuracy
20carrier interviews5prototype tests70%+weekly action or usefulness rate

Discovery

Invoices, payments, bank activity, factoring records, email, and operating data do not agree. Operators discover revenue leakage and payment risk too late.

Owner-operators, small-fleet owners, dispatchers, and back-office staff at carriers with two–ten trucks.

My 0-to-1 scope

  • Analyzed 15+ months of carrier financial and operational data
  • Conducted 20 interviews and five prototype tests
  • Defined the insight rules, success metrics, and MVP roadmap
  • Integrated OCR, document extraction, and invoice-payment detection into one workflow
  • Ran the internal pilot and prepared expansion to additional carriers

What testing changed

Twenty interviews and five prototype tests disproved the dashboard-first hypothesis. The MVP now detects problems, links each alert to source evidence, and recommends an action.

Replace another dashboard with actionable alerts

Detect a narrow set of operational problems and recommend the next action. Testing showed that operators wanted problems surfaced, not another place to inspect data.

Alternative considered: Build a general dashboard or broad chatbot.

Trade-off: The MVP covers fewer workflows, but each alert has a clear usefulness measure.

Show the evidence behind every alert

Link each alert to invoice, payment, bank, factoring, and email evidence. Operators needed to understand why an alert appeared before acting on it.

Alternative considered: Generate autonomous recommendations without source traceability.

Trade-off: Entity resolution is harder than summarization, but creates a more trustworthy product.

Internal-pilot evidence

DISCOVERED

20 interviews showed operators needed problems surfaced—not another dashboard.

VALIDATED

90%+ invoice and payment-status detection accuracy.

Start with a broad chatbot
INTERNAL PILOT

3+ actionable insights per carrier each week.

70%+ weekly action or usefulness rate
internal-pilot results

Expand only after alerts prove accurate and actionable

1. discover

20 carrier interviews and five prototype tests.

2. match

90%+ invoice/payment-status accuracy.

3. act

3+ actionable insights per carrier each week.

4. validate

70%+ weekly action or usefulness rate.

Outcome

Accuracy

The internal pilot reached at least 90% invoice/payment-status detection accuracy.

Usefulness

The product generated at least three genuinely actionable insights per carrier per week.

Action

At least 70% of pilot users acted on or explicitly confirmed one recommendation each week.

measurement notes

Definitions and sources are shown so every result can be examined in an interview.

90%+ detection accuracy

Measured invoice and payment-status classification in the one-company internal pilot.

3+ weekly insights

Genuinely actionable insights generated per carrier each week during the pilot.

70%+ weekly action rate

Pilot users who acted on or explicitly confirmed at least one useful recommendation each week.

20 interviews · 5 tests

Discovery across owner-operators, small-fleet owners, dispatch, and back-office roles.

The pilot replaced a dashboard-first assumption with a narrower product thesis: find the problem, explain the evidence, and make the next action obvious.